Down vs. synthetic insulation has been and will always be a notable topic for discussion in the realm of hunting clothing and gear. Most people agree that down has superior insulation qualities. High quality down in the 850 to 900 fill power range is unmatched in its warmth to weight ratio. In addition, it compresses extremely well. On the flip side of the coin, you have hunters that wouldn’t consider down, knowing that synthetic insulation will still provide warmth when wet. However, natural, high quality down is still my preferred insulation. Here is why.
I take every reasonable precaution necessary to insure that my insulation layers and sleeping bag remain dry. My sleeping bag is contained within a watertight stuff sack and at times, within a waterproof bivy sack as well. It is not getting wet. As far as down jackets go, when I do wear it, it is below a waterproof shell. I hardly ever wear insulation when I am moving so perspiration isn’t an issue. If you can wear your insulation piece while you are moving, it probably isn’t warm enough to keep you warm through a long glassing session. If you didn’t catch that, it was a hint to the synthetic guys out there.
I know what some of you guys are thinking, “stuff happens,” right? Well, let’s say that my sleeping bag did happen to get wet. I don’t care if it is down or synthetic, I am not sleeping in that thing. I can’t image a more uncomfortable way to spend the night in the high country. I would rather walk out in the middle of the night, and that is what I would do. This is where my disclaimer comes in. If I was hunting in a situation where hiking out to my truck was not an option, say for an Alaskan drop camp hunt, I would defiantly consider synthetic insulation. But, for here in Wyoming or in Colorado, Montana, Idaho, Nevada and Utah down is the way to go for me. Maybe it will get me in trouble one of these days, but I doubt it.
- Justin Starck -




